The word “developing” can surely be removed. But I am not sure how low-yield morula is. Since it is in the attached photo, I guess it is ok to take it out?
It’s not about LY vs HY.
The idea of the bulk here is to remove the stage’s name (e.g., morula in this case) as it only adds confusion (the text is different from the image in the extra section). Hence, we have many open suggestions in this and other similar cards
UW: 8406, Amboss article, and first aid don’t mention the stage’s name to classify the types of twin pregnancies. They only use the days when the division happens
I feel like we’ve had this discussion before - don’t remember what I said last time, but FA seems to include the cell stages
then we probably should delete the image in the extra or find a better one
I think a new image could be a good solution. The question now is finding one