Haven’t gone through GI yet, would it be possible to misinterpret “may perforate” applying to both complications? Would be my only reservation, support otherwise
I agree with @CTE_BrainDamage
I’ve done that card many times and I never read it in a way that would require it to be changed
But in general I do think it’s worded a little funny just not sure how to fix it
Maybe just take out “which may perforate” part?
Agree with guys above - suggested change makes it sound like either can perforate when the issue is perforation of toxic megacolon. Do not support.
Added #deck-AnKing Overhaul for Step 1 & 2-AnKingMed and removed #deck-anking-overhaul-for-step-1–2-ankingmed
Added #deck-AnKing Overhaul for Step 1 & 2-AnKingMed and removed #deck-anking-overhaul-for-step-1–2-ankingmed
Thank you all. Im going with @shmuelsash suggestion, will keep to extra so its clear and easier to read
Added #deck-AnKing Overhaul for Step 1 & 2-AnKingMed and removed #deck-anking-overhaul-for-step-1–2-ankingmed
Added accepted-suggestion, #deck-AnKing Overhaul for Step 1 & 2-AnKingMed and removed #deck-anking-overhaul-for-step-1–2-ankingmed, open-suggestion