definitely agree with the extra field change, not sure if removing this from a text field is appropriate. can someone with more pharm knowledge weigh in?
I have no idea whats more used in practice currently, maybe reword card to “can be used” instead of “are used” therefore not leading someone to think that’s whats currently used as mechanistically would be correct
Admittedly, UK practice rather than US, but I’m pretty sure I’ve seen all of the others in practice (ampicillin a bit less common, but definitely amox & pip/taz) - have definitely never seen ticarcillin in practice (and while mentioned in passing in the BNF, doesn’t have its own page unlike all the others).
Re the ‘are used’ - my vote would be for leaving that as-is rather than ‘can be used’ - with the reasoning that pip is only available in combination with taz (again, at least in the UK - though I doubt it’s different in the US) - meaning that in practice you DO need to use them together.