@AnKing-Maintainers I see what they mean that under the table “Step 5 lacks SABA PRN” but maybe its just me I feel like SABA PRN is implied with all Asthma tx I say we just reject and then make sure the spelling of “prevalence” is updated in a separate suggestion to make sure the table isn’t broken
I think the suggestion is trying to say that LABA is missing which is true no?
Yes LABA is missing (and is needed) from the first point. But we need a new suggestion with the table not broken.
I was thinking the right call is to just put an asterisk on “medium*” in the text and just put “Or High dose ICS” in the extra to reduce words/ confusion bc that’s the only thing that changes between steps 4 & 5.
Sorry, I didn’t explain that very well in my first message.