The other similar open suggestion already has 4 upvotes. This is a more concise version . Can we close this today
I would prefer keeping #6 split up as “{{c1::Hydralazine }} and {{c1::nitrates }}” instead of combining it in the same cloze
I am trying to focus on the content at the moment, but I don’t really get why “nitrates” instead of “isosorbide dinitrates”
Also two clozes is a big hint imo, no need for it. I am not against it but maybe in a future suggestion
Fair enough. I just don’t know if this card needs to be harder than it already is, and H-ISDN is already covered by other cards. Support either way.
Indifferent on nitrates vs ISDN. Was just copying from the text of the original card
I agree with @andrewmathias8. The card is already really hard and nid:1522787422448 explicitly tests both already as one cloze. I favor keeping hydralazine and nitrates as two clozes. I would favor changing both this nid and nid:1522787422448 to “isosorbide dinitrate” instead of “nitrates.”
I accidentally rejected this suggestion, thinking it was another one because I had multiple tabs open at the same time 
Is there a way to revert this, or do I need to submit the suggestion again?
I think resubmit, link to this discussion in a comment, and count the upvotes from here if needed for approval