Wasn’t there a discussion about this on another suggestion or Slack?
We were discussing even adding a new card as well or something like that?
Hmmm, as I remember it, there was a discussion on a suggestion thread which resulted in additions to Extra on this card, but not to the Text. Earlier today I happened upon an old suggestion for this card (which I rejected in favor of proposing these changes here instead). Perhaps there were additional discussions before my time or that I don’t remember.
I believe my suggestion is a good addition along the lines of the bit we added in Extra. There issue being: the card doesn’t specify what it means by “management.” Management of symptoms of claudication? Because in that case the answer would be cilostazol. Or management of progression of disease? (The answer being clopidogrel). Although we already addressed this in Extra, I think it’s worth aligning the Text with those changes as well.
I believe we have agreed on two ideas: one focuses on reducing cardiovascular risk through antiplatelet therapy, and the other addresses symptomatic treatment with cilostazol. you change will make this card a duplicate for nid:1532194776193.
I think the best approach is to cover the aspect of symptomatic treatment, where the answer will be cilostazol. i.e., “Which medication is most appropriate for improving claudication symptoms in peripheral arterial disease (PAD)? {{c1::Cilostazol}}”
I remember that, as @Jwill said, this was brought up in Slack a few months ago. Most people thought card should say cilostazol. I also saw that you rejected a suggestion about this recently.
Don’t know if this makes great sense, but since the card is already marked as potential dupe, I would suggest making it a two-for-one:
Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD):
Prevent progression/complications: {{c1::Clopidogrel::Cilostazol/Clopidogrel}}
Symptoms of claudication: {{c1::Cilostazol::Cilostazol/Clopidogrel}}
Agree with Jacob’s suggestion, card certainly needs to change I think
I like this too!
@AnKing-Maintainers I’ve updated according to Jacob’s suggestion
We may need to add rationale for change as well
@herstein.jacob did you just mean to add a “this card used to say… (Feb 2025)” sort of thing?
Yes, exactly!