Okay. I understand the reasoning, though obviously I wish I had known beforehand so I could have done a more appropriate job.
Should I wait to tag more, or is the primary issue simply adding a rationale with each tag? For example, if I continue my work and add a rationale to each tag is that sufficient?
More explicitly, how extensive of a rationale would you like? If it’s as simple as a question that references a specific equation, is it sufficient to note that the question requires the relevant equation to solve it? Or would you like the rationales to be much longer, more detailed?
You can continue tagging, we just require a proper rationale. You can see the AnKing Step Deck rule for UWorld QID tagging, the same will apply to the MCAT deck.
We only want cards tagged that will directly help you get the question right.
Basically each rationale should answer:
What was the question about and why tagging this card will help the user get the question right
Hope this helps