Would be good to get another source for this since the AMBOSS article does not explicitly say what we would be changing to
UTD under the article “Approach to the patient with suspected angina pectoris” :“An ECG obtained when the chest discomfort is present will often show J point and ST-segment depression, which indicates subendocardial ischemia. When the patient is asymptomatic, the ECG may be entirely normal.”
I think this would be good for extra field (which is currently blank)
“Resting ECG is usually normal in stable angina; therefore, ST depression may only be seen during exertion , mental stress, and/or cold exposure”
https://next.amboss.com/us/article/DS01bf?q=stable%20angina%20ecg#Ya9cba89fbd8644ce978baa6fd829539b
Agree with Ian
You mean instead of the proposed change to the text?
Leaving the text as it is feels wrong to me. In my mind, stable angina equals a normal ECG
I see what you mean. I just looked through cards to see some type of terminology we can use like" symptomatic stable angina =" or “stable angina during exertion =”
Well, may of found potential dupe or at least another card that accurately covers concept
nid=1471880418039
so either delete this one or change it to stable angina during rest? = normal ECG!
Either way would probably need to go to slack for a vote