4 Likes
UW also uses pitting
2 Likes
AMBOSS mentions “Nail involvement (e.g., pitting, onycholysis)” - Should we change it to involvement and add pitting to the extra? Honestly also think pitting is fine too (not sure how common onycholysis is)
would support putting in extra, Amboss says “Nail involvement (e.g., pitting, onycholysis)”, nail pitting is covered in nid:1488502577984 as well
Agree with @thomas.holmes , would leave text as is and just give examples of the types of nail lesions we see. Then it can be pushed
updated
1 Like