Suggestion is improperly formatted however it suggests reversion to cards previous state. See original discussion behind change here: [08.20.2024] Updated content, AnKing-MCAT/AnKingMed, ID 2035358 - #6 by Brian_BH.
I understand the intention based on the discussion but the current definition is somewhat wordy and can maybe be tweaked. LMK what you guys think.
Yeah, it’s not my favorite phrasing. I can’t recall exactly now why we settled on this, but it’s a bit wordy. In part, I think it was to avoid ambiguity with its sister card on ‘prospective cohort’.
Unfortunately, at a glance I don’t see it in Kaplan or UWorld
Additionally, we’ll probably need to fix both this and the sibling card as well, just to make sure that both are tight. It’s tagged by Khan, though not to any specific sub-section, which of course makes it a bit more annoying
just changed it to the AnKing USMLE definition
This user is apparently doing a lot of Blueprint prep, so these have been a constant presence worth keeping an eye out for
Yes, I am using the Blueprint self-paced course and have just tagged the cards by the Blueprint chapters as I review content. I used this deck before with the Kaplan textbooks, and it was perfect. But I am adding the tags to unsuspend along with the chapters. The Blueprint organization is a little more confusing than Kaplan or Khan Academy, so it’s adding some work to my Anki usage. I don’t know if anyone with ANKING can see my tags or would want to see them, but after I finish the content review, it will be organized for Blueprint Chapters. I don’t know if they would consider adding that, but that would be cool for Blueprint users! Also, thanks for updating the card, and loving this deck by the way.
The deck maintainers can see them when you make suggestions to cards. 
It’s not a project that we’ve talked about much just yet, though it’s not something I’m opposed to inherently. For tagging projects, though, they typically have to be considered and given a green-light first, and we have formalized processes in place to varying degrees to ensure that they are entered, and completed, in a way that allows us to ensure quality control and the like.
At least for now any Blueprint tags that are suggested will likely be taken off, but happy to discuss the idea further if you have large-scale plans or are interested in contributing to tags generally.
Blueprint is becoming more popular all across medical education so I think these tags would be beneficial. But I agree with Brian that we just need to make sure we have a standardized tag nomenclature, similar to kaplan chapters