@kaiiak , could you provide a source to support your rationale?
Hi,
I suggested this change because the current content provides the same Gibbs free energy equation as 1554206949122, and it isn’t specific to redox reactions. I modified the equation to substitute standard Gibbs free energy with its calculation from moles of e-, Faraday’s constant, and standard cell potential (ΔG° = −RTlnK = −nFE∘cell). This relationship is found on 1560029331994 and also described in the textbook linked below. Let me know what you think.
Perfect! Thank you for this whole explanation @kaiiak ! We’re hitting two birds with one stone by avoiding a duplicate note with 1554206949122 and replacing it with a new relevant equation. Thank you for including that in your reply