4 Likes
@herstein.jacob @Cameron @shmuelsash @Ahmed7 @zarathustra @Tahseen @Bilal @Morgankota13 @thomas.holmes @Joe
2 Likes
looks okay, a bit too much underlining at the end should be reduced
Edited the underline
Don’t support this change in current form - it’s part of a pair w/ nid:1639071665168, which is on EMB without atypia (treated with progestins). Would change this card to have two c1, one for no future childbearing vs. one for future childbearing
1 Like
@Ahmed7 @herstein.jacob @Sameem updated text and extra section (source: https://next.amboss.com/us/article/UJ0btS?q=endometrial%20hypertrophy%20with%20atypia#9zcNEU0). Agree with changes now.
2 Likes