In this case, I would argue that the ambiguity of the cloze is kind of the point. Splitting it sort of gives it away
I’d agree on that point, and argue the same for the DNA and RNA being split as well. It would be better to combine both I’d say
Agreed there. If we’re going to pick one lane, might as well be consistent. 
If you’d like to submit that as a new suggestion happy to take a look at it with the other maintainers.
Thanks for the suggestions, btw. Even if they don’t all get approved, many hands always make light work and the deck is always better for having people who care enough to take the time. 
Done. Completely agree, it’s also important to get perspectives on things and discuss. Especially in different contexts that may be missed by different people or in isolation.
100%. Having more perspectives is always good. The MCAT deck doesn’t have nearly the user base of the Step deck, and so often it’s the same 3-4 people making edits and of course that’s helpful, but having other voices is always appreciated and welcome.