Changed the extra based on Amboss “As HR increases, diastole is shortened, which decreases SV due to less filling time” “Despite a decrease in SV, the CO is maintained by an increased HR.”
I think it’s better if we don’t make any statement about the CO because we don’t know how the SV is decreasing relative to how the HR is increasing, so it could go either way. Seems better to just say that SV will decrease while being agnostic towards change in CO
i was thinking the same tbh
I remember Bnb talking about this and how some arrhythmias where HR goes up to 300 can lead to decrease in CO
@AnKing-Maintainers support
@anking-maintainers 3 open suggestions all saying the same thing. This thread seems to be all in agreement with the listed edit. Maybe 1-2 more upvotes then we push?