This suggestion needs a proper rationale, but please keep it for now for future reference
I can’t speak for everyone, but this note and note: 1583446174662 are very similar and have led to some confusion, at least on my end.
These cards don’t quite contain the same information for diagnosing Lyme disease as what is stated in the AMBOSS guidelines. The information seems to differ.
Is there any way to modify these cards to reduce some confusion?
This card and the one you mentioned are part of this bulk change I am suggesting (see the two below). I am unsure if the original card is correct, but I am sure it doesn’t help me answer the questions correctly.
My change is mainly from UW (I forgot the ID, but I can return to it). It’s not 100% true, but it’s a simplified answer that helps to understand the topic right.
I find the approach in amboss is straightforward, and we should use it in the card
I agree with that change!