Tbh this needs further rework as from my understanding the definition requires mention of the growth plate being involved, alongside the metaphysis. These cards would probably benefit from adapting wording verbatim from a set source. @braviboron @alexlewis
@alexlewis @Stapedius I would support rejecting and keeping wording based on Radiopaedia. Can add any source discrepancies to extra or additional resources.
You’re all correct this needs a proper rework. I’m not fussed what we do with these cards right now
@alexlewis @Stapedius Am I crazy to think these cards are pretty good as they are? Maybe we could just add a second cloze for the inverse? I study them and quite like them as is.
I think they’re just inaccurate as currently written. Radiopedia defines this for example as “fracture passes across most of the growth plate and up through the metaphysis” - this card only mentions the metaphysis bit. But as long as they’re rewritten to match the radiopedia definition I think they’re great. @braviboron @alexlewis
Will reject and re-submit some general amendments across all cards for you guys to approve @alexlewis @braviboron