@carpenterls15 Since UVA refers to it as PGA, I wonder if it would be best to keep the terminology as it is. My reasoning is that this deck is supposed to supplement AnKing, not mirror it, and should be geared toward UVA’s material and how UVA will test us. Thoughts? My proposal would be to add notes in Extra making it clear that there is a difference in terminology between AnKing and UVA (keeping the APS in parentheses as well to drive the point home).