@kevinpanini this is one of those where the intent is appreciation, but the formatting is all over the map (no mathjax, no superscripts, etc.).
The biggest outstanding issue, I think, is that this card is about the concept rather than the equation (which doesn’t disqualify it, but these details would certainly be better used on nid:1554150850127).
That being said, if we like it enough that we want it, we’ll have to clean it up. I think it’s a nice addition, but needs to be cleaned up a lot for inclusion.
Let me know what you think; happy to go whichever way your thoughts lead us on this one
I don’t think Mathjax is necessarily ultimately for the backside, but it could be superscript/subscripted to make it more readable. I also see what u mean; the equation is just a reminder. I’m not sure if these variables are explained in another card, but it would be better.
I think they’re not, and maybe would be good for both cards but at the very least would be higher priority for the card/s that deal directly with the equation itself