@Ahmed7 @Cameron @thomas.holmes @Sameem @zarathustra @NiceJewishBoy @shmuelsash @Jwill - direct conflict here for AMBOSS vs. UW. Other sources seem to say < 100 (regardless of sex)
support
NCBI NLM says there is conflicting data for male vs female and agrees with less than 100, also states 100 to 200 is acceptable while greater than that is diagnostic.
support
I don’t love this because the discrepancy is so big, but nothing we can do about that… just for reference
UpToDate: 50-100 is normal, > 200 mL is abnormal, 100-2000 requires clinical correlation
Cleveland Clinic: 50-100
Reviews in Urology (2004): <50 (50-100 if elderly)
Statpearls NLM says same as @herstein.jacob said.
I think 150 is the better call in the text field… for now. the clarifiers of discrepancy in the extra of current suggestion I think make it clear there’s no “perfect answer” right now
If greater than “200” is required for abnormal then I think >150 is not going to be a cause for concern even if it’s above the 50-100 mark of other sources. any question is most likely going to exaggerate the amount if they would like us to be concerned like post void 300-400.
Closing this one out based on votes.