Amboss says Conn’s syndrome is just primary hyperaldosteronism. Can’t check UW QID but i think the definition of Conn syndrome varies depending on source.
Agree w/ @thomas.holmes, I’ve seen this defined differently depending on the source (I think even within our deck). I prefer this formatting for the question better, though, as currently c1 doesn’t have much utility for testing. Here’s how I’d do it:
{{c2::Primary hyperaldosteronism (Conn syndrome)}} is most commonly caused by {{c1::bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (60%)}} or {{c1::aldosteronoma (30%)}}
Note: some sources define Conn syndrome as primary hyperaldosteronism regardless of cause while others specify this denotes a aldosteronoma
Thoughts? @Ahmed7 @herstein.jacob @shmuelsash @Eli.Tanenbaum @morgankota13 @Sameem @zarathustra
Agree with @Cameron
Agree with @Cameron - would just suggest switching c1 / c2 around so they are more similar to original card (c2 for hyperplasia / adenoma)
Support version from @Cameron with changes suggested by @thomas.holmes