can also do "can be improved by weight {{c1::loss}} or wearing looser clothes
That’d work too but then I think the bit about wearing looser clothes would give it away. Maybe move the looser clothes bit to the top of the extra with that change?
Both are pretty obvious - can’t see anyone thinking weight gain would help improve Meralgia paresthetica aha
So do you think like lifestyle intervention plus move the loose clothes bit to extra?
ya think that’s better, would still leave wearing looser clothing in text though, things are easily missed / forgotten about in extra section
Yeah, I agree. Don’t want to de-emphasize the tight fitting clothing as afaik that’s one of the main causes we test on elsewhere
What about can be improved by weight {{c1::loss}} or {{c1::wearing looser clothes::clothing}}
We could do
improved by weight {{c1::loss::gain/loss}} or wearing {{c1::looser::looser/tighter}} clothes
But I don’t think it would be entirely necessary.
I like the version you just proposed
I don’t want to make this too hard, but I am open to this being relatively overhauled because I agree that it’s super obvious right now - for example, "improved by {{c1::losing weight & wearing looser clothes::2 lifestyle modifications}}. Still, harder is not always better for retention… might send this one in Slack for discussion
I like your version. @Anking-maintainers are we good with Jacob’s version?
I still think the below version conveys the info just as much in a simpler way. You don’t need to memorize everything word for word. This version below tests concept rather than how much you can memorize the wording
improved by weight {{c1::loss::gain/loss}} or wearing {{c1::looser::looser/tighter}} clothes
Agree with @Ahmed7
Personally think it’s fine as is, if you know the causes from nid:1496701381425 (obesity, tight clothing, pregnancy), then the treatment is pretty obvious without even doing this card. Okay with the suggestion by @herstein.jacob if others agree with it though
Fine with @Ahmed7 version as well! Mine was just an alternative to resolve the “this is obvious” issue
Ok if no objection by the end of the day let’s approve @Ahmed7 's version