@Michael_B, seems perfectly reasonable to me. Beautification is a valid pursuit.
So, when it comes to formatting, I think this suggestion and the previous one on color contrast illustrate a good point. The original version of the card for this suggestion has green highlight - not standard for our cards and something we want to achieve with these cards is uniformity. Another example is how we always put the Khan Academy link at the bottom of Extra, which is done here too. Other than that, the only other edits are bolding a term that’s being defined (totally reasonable) and changing e.I. to e.g. - I haven’t heard of e.I. but e.g. is definitely appropriate here
Copy all of the above. That’s super useful insight.
So you can, in a given instance, decide to approve some but not all of a given edit’s suggested changes?
(lol, I wonder if the original card creator meant i.e.).
Yea, I’m thinking it was probably i.e. - but “i.e.” translates to “that is” or “in other words” (I think of it as i.e. starts with an i and so does “in other words”). E.g. is “for example” which is what they give in parentheses
And yes, as maintainers, we can edit cards to include some but not all parts of a suggestion. On some accepted suggestions, you might see “co-author: Michael_B” and that just means that I edited the card a bit. But here, we’ll take all parts of the suggestion
I can honestly say I don’t think I could have defined the difference between i.e. and e.g. Going to have to make an Anki card now so I don’t repeat the same error. 
Haha, gotta save those mental notes somewhere yk