@AnKing-Maintainers open to all and any feedback on this image, not really sure of how this image came out
I like the first image since its less crowded. Then maybe keep the conus medullaris and cauda equina a separate image? (For step 1 that makes more sense to me but not sure for step 2 so i’ll let someone else comment)
That was originally the plan, but then I saw Amboss includes conus medullaris and cauda equina syndromes under Incomplete spinal cord syndromes (see table) as well, not separately
So I thought it might be prudent to compare those with these 2 as well
We could divide (as planned earlier), or remove some text from this image to make it more concise
I really like how the 2nd one breaks out the symptoms for easy compare & contrast
What about my idea for “linking” images and putting conus medullaris and cauda equina in a separate one with spinal cord compression?
Would we include all nids that the image is on in the text for the link?
Even if its only 1 (just so the user knows where to go for the other image)
I dont think the nid text on the first image is needed on the image itself
Sorry didn’t see message
It got lost in all my notifications
Its exactly what I was looking for, thank you so much! ![]()
Also @beejumm just noticed this today while doing cards. The image from Wikimedia is CC BY SA so that means we can’t copyright the image (I’m 99% sure).
So you would just need to remove the copyright logo
Ah okay, didn’t see that, will get to that asap
It’s for both of these images, right? @Ahmed7
Yes unfortunately. Anything share alike





