@Anking-maintainers this does seem odd to me. why is one in the cloze but the other is in extra?
Not sure we need it since salmonella is tested in nid:1521306536672 and it’s also mentioned in the extra section of this card
My guess is that this card was built off of Sketchy which does directly teach E. coli as being catalase positive, but doesn’t teach salmonella
yeah it just seems odd that one is mentioned but not the other. I think the mention of salmonella if we don’t want to test it in the cloze would be better in main
We could do the similar phrasing we’ve done for some other suggestions and just leave it outside of the cloze.
{{c1::E. coli}} and Salmonella
I just feel like it would be redundant with nid:1521306536672. As well FA2024 (pg. 126) doesn’t even list Salmonella as being catalase positive, so I don’t feel like it’d be super high-yield.
Had a similar discussion re: these organisms for concept of being found in M cells. Not sure what the decision was, but think we rejected
I remember that discussion and I think we agreed that E. Coli is more HY to know that it’s catalase positive. Basically for questions that test on CGD using recurrent infections
AMBOSS does not mentioned salmonella and we couldn’t find any questions that did either from what I recall.
Clinical features
- Recurrent, severe infections (chronic skin, lymph node, bone, respiratory, GI, and urinary tract infections) with catalase-positive organisms (S. aureus, Nocardia spp., Escherichia coli, Candida, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Aspergillus, Serratia)