Needs UW QID check, but either way not sure why this card necessarily needs to change - seems ok as is (even if it somewhat narrow in scope)
1 Like
UW’s question is about acute pulmonary edema due to ACS (the other card cover it perfectly which has the tag as well)
I felt like the focus here should be on congestive heart failure therapy, not acute pulmonary edema.
my main issue with the original card is that it uses “and” so I feel like it’s talking about two different entities and it uses “are”
Will it be ok to change it to (CHF “with” pulmonary edema)?
Would agree that “with” is probably better
1 Like