Wouldn’t change text based off this personally. Could potentially add as a note in extra if others want
Oh how come? According to UTD, it mentions that “Epilepsy occurs more frequently in children who have had febrile seizures. However, the risk that a child will develop epilepsy after a single, simple febrile seizure is only slightly higher than that of a child who never has a febrile seizure.” This card seems to imply that there is no increased risk after a febrile seizure and I got the question wrong cause of that. I guess the note in the extra section also works.
Because like you found the risk is only slightly higher in children that have had a febrile seizure while this is asking if there’s a high risk. We’d be changing the purpose/structure of the card despite it not being incorrect. I’d say it just has some incomplete information that can be clarified/explained in extra; could also try reformatting the original text a bit as well as italics tend to go unnoticed when reviewing in my experience
That makes sense. Thanks!