AMBOSS: 5-year survival rate: 60–80%; we should change this card… maybe {{c1::Relatively good (5-year survival rate: 60–80%)}}?
“however, survivors tend…” could probably be moved to Extra
@anking-maintainers thoughts? Card is based on Pathoma, which still says poor prognosis. AMBOSS agrees with change. UW has some questions that do not explicitly mention progrnosis.
Keep text as is but can say in extra “however recent advancements have led to a much greater 5-year survival rate of 60-80%”
Fine with whatever way we go with this, card isn’t super useful anyways
I would prefer relatively good imo, but extra will also work
@Ahmed7 I added this as a note, but I think the card is incorrect enough that it warrants updating text field rather than leaving as is. Thoughts?
Since it doesn’t get tested (i dont think) and its relatively harmless to change i think we can consider