Suggestion is correct but I think this one specifies of the skin because of extra field comparison “vs. keratin pseudocysts/keratin-filled cysts/ horn cysts in seborrheic keratosis”
@AnKing-Maintainers
https://next.amboss.com/us/article/nh07ef?q=keratin%20pearl#Ya9d3fe36573659ee080359ba55de0878
Keratin pearls can be found in most (probably all) SCC not just SCC of the skin. The point of this card is comparing histology findings of cSCC vs. SK
would it make sense to merge with nid:1488680149971? this could provide a comparative perspective that highlights the histological differences between cSCC and SK while reducing potential confusion
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is characterized histologically by the formation of {{c1::keratin pearls}}, vs. seborrheic keratosis (SK), which shows {{c2::keratin pseudocysts (horn cysts)}}
I think we can add to extra that almost all SCC is associated with keratin pearls, this way we can fix this issue going forward
Agreed that way the focus is still on histology comparison between cSCC vs. SK
Added " - Note : Most types of SCC are associated with keratin pearls, this card focuses on cSCC to compare vs. SK" because I could just see us getting suggestions in the future to make it just SCC. Wanted to avoid that now and to further emphasize this discussion
Personally, I don’t like this because it’s merging two concepts into 1 card which isn’t ideal. Your idea seems more like a step 2 card that would be a reminder rather than a step 1 card for learning.