Thank you for your suggestion! Can you post the note ID or Ankihub of the other card(s) please?
I believe she based this off of a card I previously updated because of this uworld question; QID: 2102. The note id is 1503605902487. Hope this helps !
Beautiful. Support
@somarimed I believe you copied the nid of this note, not the note that was previously updated based on the UW qid?
This needs more investigation with adequate sources. AMBOSS states that “Mixed infections with anaerobic organisms may occur (e.g., Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Bacteroides)”
hello! I think i know what happened - her suggestion is being made to the same card that i priorly edited! my edit effected two cards since there are two clozes in that card (note id: 1503605902487).
I think @sophwang was trying to update the front of that same card in order to match the updated information which i priorly added to the extras. The thing is, I did not want to change the front of the card because I don’t know if IV Amplicillin is used for aerobic aspiration pneumonia. I just wanted to mention in the extras that, technically, most aspiration pneumonia is aerobic (as opposed to anerobic). The uworld question was not about ampicillin, so I have no idea how the new evidence on aspiration pneumonia being aerobic affects the use of ampicillin for treatment of aspiration pneumonia. I hope that makes sense!
i went back to the question that prompted me to make the suggestion. The uworld qid was 2102. If you look in the answer description, it indicates that aspiration pneumonia is aerobic according to newer studies. It says that first line empiric treatment is for typical community acquired pneumonia pathogens and that anaerobic coverage is only needed if empyema or lung abcess is present! hope this helps!
I see-- @somarimed 's suggestion still open. Even though this cloze isn’t wrong, (anaerobic aspiration pneumonia is a thing, albeit less common than aerobic), I support changing it for the sake of avoiding confusion. Instead of deleting, could also change to “(e.g., Fusobacterium or Bacteroides)” with no cloze
If we approve this suggestion, then we don’t need to approve @somarimed’s open suggestion, since it would be out of context
@AnKing-Maintainers AMBOSS and UW show that aspiration pneumonia is more commonly caused by aerobes than anaerobes, so this example should be deleted to avoid confusion.
UWorld - Step 1 2102
agreed