@daltoncaples while i love the image, unfortunately because the image is copyrighted by uworld, it cannot be added into the deck, this is the reason why we use public access images or have to make ourt own. If you can find a public image that does the same and follows teh below guideliens i would be happy to include it.
Just out of curiosity I made this image myself using Canvas and did not pull any information from UWorld. Thank you for your feedback.
Oh wow, my apologies. It looked so good I thought it was the uworld one because I know uworld has a very similar image lmao. In that case I think it’s perfect the way it is cause I currently have the similar uworld image in my personal deck.
This description of acids and bases is fairly standard based on my undergraduate experience. If there are any issues, I can adjust the color scheme or make any necessary changes to avoid complications.
Looks good to me, I think it’s good to merge @pkaps01 any opinions?
i I think it’s a really nice looking image. Couple considerations:
- Why do we refer to the lewis definition specifically as Lewis base in the overarching category/title? Same with the Arrhenius definition.
- I believe its spelled Arrhenius.
- The new imaging guidelines suggest using AnkiHub, LLC rather than AnKing LLC.
- I dont think the current image we have in the extra section in this card should be replaced. If anything this should be added.
- Are we concerned that it makes it appear these definitions are subcategories of each other? or is it clear this image just shows narrowing scope?
Sorry all, ya boi was on vacation for a few days (a rare event indeed). Just now catching up on some of this:
It’s great to see some new blood in illustrations and whatnot. We for sure get far too little of that, and it is very welcome. 
For sure the spelling for ‘Arrhenius’ should be fixed, I think
Preferable, s’il vous plait
Agreed here; still good to have the mechanistic Lewis diagram for proper illustration of the specific example in the card (which is a Lewis acid)
I’m open to ideas here, though I think this may kind of work, since:
All Arrhenius bases are, by definition, always also Bronsted-Lowry bases. And, similarly, all Bronsted-Lowry bases are, by definition, also always Lewis bases (correct me if my memory fails me on this).
Like little matryoshka dolls:
